DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47982/cgc.10.754Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Guido Lori, Giorgi Rogava, Michael Engelmann, Giampiero Manara

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Dissipative façade connections to the building improve the envelope behaviour in response to explosions, permitting to deliver a less stiff system. Moreover, the façade transfers lower shear forces, requiring lighter concrete embedment. A relevant effect in the global building behaviour can be observed as well, towards a minimized construction impact on the urban carbon footprint. The authors, using representative cases of sensitive buildings and typical threats, compare the façade design carried out with and without dissipative brackets and the resulting size of the major façade elements. The outcomes of the study are presented in terms of cost and embodied carbon, both normalized to the bracket cost. Then, also the building behaviour is included in the cost analysis, assessing the building response under the load transfer from the facade, by reactions calculated with and without deformable bracket. The study identifies the drivers for a sustainable blast design and in particular the characteristics of building, façade and threat for which the use of the dissipative bracket results in crucial cost and environmental benefits. Finally, the chance to retrofit existing buildings with blast enhanced facades is addressed, by adopting dissipative brackets and reducing the need to reinforce the structures while gaining a certain blast performance; over all, the building life-span is increased with upgraded resilience to future events by avoiding carbon for structure reinforcements.
